A new report has been released called “The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families”. Along with a lot of helpful advice for the parents of young social media users, the report also proposes a new phenomenon called ‘Facebook depression’.

While this report has been getting a lot of attention for its description of depression linked to Facebook use, it also has a lot of good things to say about social media for children and adolescents. Some of the reported benefits include community engagement, enhancement of creativity, growth of ideas, expansion of connectivity and shared interests, and “fostering of one’s individual identity and unique social skills.”
The report also summarised a number of potential risks for kids involved with social networking, including cyberbullying, online harassment, the influence of advertising, and the loss of privacy. The evidence on sexually suggestive content is particularly worrying, saying “a recent survey revealed that 20 percent of teens have sent or posted nude or semi-nude photographs and videos of themselves.”
The report also introduced the phenomenon of Facebook depression. In an excerpt from this report: “Researchers have proposed a new phenomenon called ‘Facebook depression,’ defined as depression that develops when preteens and teens spend a great deal of time on social media sites, such as Facebook, and then begin to exhibit classic symptoms of depression.”
The report goes on to say that “the intensity of the online world is thought to be a factor that may trigger depression in some adolescents” adding “as with offline depression, pre-adolescents and adolescents who suffer from Facebook depression are at risk for social isolation and sometimes turn to risky Internet sites and blogs for ‘help’ that may promote substance abuse, unsafe sexual practices, or aggressive or self-destructive behaviours.”
However, the evidence of depression linked to Facebook use is very tentative, with at least one opponent, Dr. John Grohol, editor-in-chief of PsychCentral.com, writing a very critical analysis of the AAP report. Dr Grohol has criticised the authors, saying that they “can’t differentiate between correlation and causation,” and calling this part of the report “shoddy research.”